public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "matz at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51117] [4.7 regression] rev.181172 causes glibc build failure Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:27:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-51117-4-WTQOrFcw9e@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-51117-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51117 Michael Matz <matz at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |MOVED --- Comment #2 from Michael Matz <matz at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-15 15:50:21 UTC --- See http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13411 for analysis and possible patch. The newly emitted calls to _Unwind_Resume suck in new object files that weren't included before leading to these multiple defined symbols. glibc needs to deal with this in one or the other way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-15 15:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-11-13 12:42 [Bug tree-optimization/51117] New: " markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2011-11-15 10:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51117] " izamyatin at gmail dot com 2011-11-15 16:27 ` matz at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2011-11-29 19:03 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-05 14:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-05 14:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-06 1:06 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-08 17:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-09 11:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-09 16:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-09 20:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-13 14:01 ` matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-13 14:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-15 17:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-51117-4-WTQOrFcw9e@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).