From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-375301-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5030 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2011 18:08:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 4995 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2011 18:08:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:07:48 +0000
From: "rth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51117] [4.7 regression] rev.181172 causes glibc build failure
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed CC Resolution Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-51117-4-xkZsidNnYu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51117-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51117-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg02797.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51117

Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011-11-29
                 CC|                            |rth at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|MOVED                       |
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-29 18:06:55 UTC ---
I think this is a gcc bug.  In particular, one of two things ought to happen:

(1) Use the form of try_finally that ignores EH.  This would lose clobber
    information on EH paths; dunno if this really turns out to be important.

(2) Remove EH cleanup handlers that only involve clobbers which lead to 
    function exit via REX.  This would wait until pass_lower_eh_dispatch,
    as that's the first point at which we know whether we actually exit
    the function, post-inlining.