public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "michael.v.zolotukhin at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/51134] [4.7 Regression] x86 memset/memcpy expansion is broken Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:23:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-51134-4-27IDd1XULo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-51134-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51134 --- Comment #12 from Michael Zolotukhin <michael.v.zolotukhin at gmail dot com> 2011-11-22 16:54:35 UTC --- > Do you have a patch for those C++ and Java regressions? What regressions do you mean exactly? I managed to fix the bootstraps (with sse_loop enabled again), but there are still some fails, so I don't send the patch. Currently I don't have a fix that solves all the problems - the attached to previous letter patch fixes some of them, but there are other fails (in 27_io and in some specs2k). I'm continuing debugging and hope to finish fixes soon. On 22 November 2011 20:34, hjl.tools at gmail dot com <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51134 > > --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-11-22 16:34:54 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #10) >> Created attachment 25882 [details] >> Patch for new memset/memcpy implementation >> >> (In reply to comment #9) >> > Regressions caused by the new memset/memcpy expansion are >> > >> > FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/wchar_t/1.cc execution test >> > FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/wchar_t/9874.cc execution test >> > FAIL: 27_io/manipulators/basefield/char/1.cc execution test >> > FAIL: 27_io/manipulators/basefield/wchar_t/1.cc execution test >> > FAIL: 27_io/objects/wchar_t/12.cc execution test >> > FAIL: 27_io/objects/wchar_t/13.cc execution test >> > FAIL: events run >> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c execution test >> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c execution test >> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34077.c (internal compiler error) >> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34077.c (internal compiler error) >> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34077.c (test for excess errors) >> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34077.c (test for excess errors) >> > FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/arrayarg.f90 execution, -O2 >> > -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops >> >> With the attached patch fails on PR34077 and arrayarg.f90 are fixed, fails on >> cleanup-tests are probably caused by incorrect testcase (see >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503). > > Do you have a patch for those C++ and Java regressions?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-22 16:55 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-11-14 23:51 [Bug target/51134] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/arrayarg.f90 hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-11-15 4:15 ` [Bug target/51134] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-11-15 5:21 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-11-15 12:40 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-11-15 14:01 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-11-15 16:44 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-11-15 19:57 ` [Bug target/51134] [4.7 Regression] x86 memset/memcpy expansion is broken hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-11-16 5:15 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-11-18 1:17 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 2:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-22 5:31 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-11-22 14:19 ` michael.v.zolotukhin at gmail dot com 2011-11-22 16:43 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-11-22 17:23 ` michael.v.zolotukhin at gmail dot com [this message] 2011-11-24 22:21 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-25 2:03 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-51134-4-27IDd1XULo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).