From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-375532-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29830 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2011 19:25:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 29811 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2011 19:25:31 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:25:18 +0000
From: "dodji at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/51180] [C++0x] inner class alias-definition variadic template error
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed AssignedTo Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-51180-4-bIsfAbAWHj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51180-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51180-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180

Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011-12-01
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-01 19:25:02 UTC ---
This is somewhat related to PR c++/51239.  I think at some point
during the substituting of t2 in to m, we should leave t2<B...>
"unbound" instead of trying to substitute B... into it.

The proper substituting of t2<B...> would happen later when B... has a
proper matching argument pack.

I am working on a joint patch for this and PR c++/51239.