From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-374304-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20436 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2011 20:17:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 20423 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Nov 2011 20:17:48 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_GM
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:17:36 +0000
From: "anlauf at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gmx dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51197-4-vCz8zTZGKK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51197-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51197-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg01800.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197

--- Comment #2 from Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> 2011-11-17 20:17:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)

> > A fatal error occurred! Backtrace for this error:
> > #0  0x80588BF in _gfortrani_show_backtrace at backtrace.c:261
> > #1  0x80494B7 in _gfortrani_backtrace_handler at compile_options.c:46
> > #2  0xFFFFE3FF
> > #3  0x80493B3 in foo at gfcbug113.f90:8
> > #4  0x804940B in backtrace at gfcbug113.f90:3
> > Floating point exception (core dumped)
> > 
> > 
> > With gfortran 4.6:
> > 
> > Program received signal 8 (SIGFPE): Floating-point exception.
> > 
> > Backtrace for this error:
> >   + [0xffffe400]
> >   + function foo (0x80494B3)
> >     at line 8 of file gfcbug113.f90
> >   + function backtrace (0x804950C)
> >     at line 3 of file gfcbug113.f90
> >   + /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5) [0xb7641705]
> 
> What exactly do you want?
> 
> In 4.7, the last line of the backtrace is
> 
>    "Floating point exception (core dumped)".
> 
> That matches the first line from 4.6
> 
>    "Program received signal 8 (SIGFPE): Floating-point exception."
> 
> 
> In 4.7, the line 
> 
> #3  0x80493B3 in foo at gfcbug113.f90:8
> 
> 
> contains all of the information from 4.6
> 
>   + function foo (0x80494B3)
>     at line 8 of file gfcbug113.f90


Well, thanks for pointing out I was not precise enough.
While "reducing" the problem, I forgot that the difference
lies in where the line

> > Floating point exception (core dumped)

ends up.  Try redirecting stderr, you'll see that in the first
case (bash on linux) this line does *not* go to stderr,
while in the second case (4.6) it does.  When running programs
in a shell with output redirected, the information will end up
in different places.

So it would be nice to actually write the SIG* information also
to stderr.

Harald