From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-374391-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30135 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2011 13:45:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 30123 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Nov 2011 13:45:46 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_BG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:45:33 +0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-51197-4-ynrBsu9RGo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51197-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51197-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg01887.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011-11-18
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-18 13:44:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> So it would be nice to actually write the SIG* information also
> to stderr.

(In reply to comment #3)
> So to get back to the stdout/stderr issue, in 4.7 the last line of the output
> is not printed by libgfortran but rather by the OS (libc?) default signal
> handler for that signal (just like happens with -fno-backtrace). So libgfortran
> has no say in where it goes.

Harald, does this solve the issue? Or do you think that gfortran should replace
the standard handler?