From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28803 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2011 22:26:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 28788 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Dec 2011 22:26:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 22:25:53 +0000 From: "kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/51244] SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 22:30:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg02724.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-12-28 22:25:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I haven't ran all tests on it yet, but CSiBE shows average code size reduction > of approx. -0.1% for -m4* with some code size increases in some files. > Would something like that be OK for stage 3? Looks good, though not appropriate for stage 3, I think.