public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/51244] SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-51244-4-vtWu9hGH6G@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-51244-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244

--- Comment #24 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-08 11:11:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Kaz, if you have some time, could you try it out in your setup, too please?

On trunk revision 185088, for sh4-unknown-linux-gnu, the result of
compare_tests is:

New tests that FAIL:

gfortran.dg/associated_4.f90  -O1  execution test
gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions  execution test
gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops  execution
test
gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90  -O3 -g  execution test

Old tests that failed, that have disappeared: (Eeek!)

22_locale/ctype/is/char/3.cc execution test
27_io/basic_filebuf/underflow/wchar_t/9178.cc execution test
gfortran.dg/widechar_intrinsics_6.f90  -Os  execution test


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-08 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-20 20:29 [Bug target/51244] New: " oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-11-22 23:36 ` [Bug target/51244] " kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-27 22:03 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-12-27 23:17 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-12-28  0:42 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-12-28  4:57 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-12-28 16:07 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2011-12-28 22:30 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-30 22:18 ` oleg.endo@t-online.de
2012-02-26 23:36 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-02 21:57 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-03 12:32 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-04 17:25 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-05 23:13 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-05 23:38 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06  8:28 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06  8:50 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06  9:48 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 10:36 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 10:38 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 10:39 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 10:40 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 11:30 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 23:43 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-08  1:26 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-08 11:12 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-03-08 11:15 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-08 11:17 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-09  0:27 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-09  1:45 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-09  8:41 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-09 10:02 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-09 10:37 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-11 13:18 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-15  8:11 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-20  1:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-20  2:33 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-20 20:41 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-07 20:53 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-08 21:43 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-30 12:01 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-02 19:24 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-08 15:03 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-23 22:58 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-23 23:29 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-26  0:20 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-30  6:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-09 15:55 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-12 22:47 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-20 20:51 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-30 22:54 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-31 10:55 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-31 15:50 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-04  8:03 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-23 21:36 ` [Bug target/51244] [SH] Inefficient conditional branch and code around T bit olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-23 21:42 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-03 21:39 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-12  0:41 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-15 22:08 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-03 12:01 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-07-18 16:11 ` laurent.alfonsi at st dot com
2013-07-18 16:12 ` laurent.alfonsi at st dot com
2013-07-20 14:38 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-07-23  8:21 ` laurent.alfonsi at st dot com
2013-07-27 19:28 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-07-28  8:51 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-07-28 12:26 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-07-31 21:46 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-23  0:13 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-23  0:25 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-24 22:43 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-03 22:50 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-12 20:47 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-12 21:26 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-05 17:54 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-06 10:47 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-10 20:19 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-16 22:55 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-13 18:48 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-22 15:07 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-22 15:50 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-22 16:08 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-01  6:50 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-17 22:53 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-17 23:08 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-17 23:15 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-24 21:56 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-24 13:06 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-01 19:16 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-51244-4-vtWu9hGH6G@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).