From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-377285-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2746 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2011 18:05:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 2735 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Dec 2011 18:05:22 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:05:07 +0000
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/51252] FAIL: c-c++-common/tm/freq.c (internal compiler error)
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51252-4-KNjZIPN35w@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51252-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51252-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg01851.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51252

--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-12-16 18:04:23 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-16 18:00:43 UTC ---
> While that might solve the ICE, the clone table doesn't actually
> get registered, which is why that clone-1 test case still fails.
>
> You'll need to play with collect2 and all its magic symbols to
> get that to work.

Of course, you mentioned that already.  Unfortunately, I didn't have
much time for gcc work lately and don't know when I get around to it.
The hack I posted is certainly better than tons of ICEs when trying to
keep track of testsuite failures.

    Rainer