From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26757 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2011 04:08:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 26748 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Nov 2011 04:08:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:08:05 +0000 From: "ai.azuma at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/51253] New: [C++11][DR 1030] Evaluation order (sequenced-before relation) among intializer-clauses in braced-init-list Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:24:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ai.azuma at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg02088.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253 Bug #: 51253 Summary: [C++11][DR 1030] Evaluation order (sequenced-before relation) among intializer-clauses in braced-init-list Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: ai.azuma@gmail.com Since DR 1030 http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1030 was accepted, I expect that the following code is well-defined and exits with the status code 0. However, GCC 4.7.0 20111112 (experimental) with -std=c++11 produces a wrong executable. In addition, it spuriously warns about undefined operations with -Wsequence-point option. ////////////////////////////////// struct swallow{ template swallow(Types &&...){} }; template int f() { int i = 2; swallow{ i = i * IS + IS... }; return i; } int main() { // `i = i * 2 + 2' should be sequenced before `i = i * 3 + 3' return f<2, 3>() == 21 ? 0 : 1; } //////////////////////////////////