From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23484 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2011 09:22:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 23476 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Nov 2011 09:22:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:22:33 +0000 From: "bardeau at iram dot fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/51268] [Regression] A subroutine can not know anymore its own interface Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:34:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bardeau at iram dot fr X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg02293.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268 --- Comment #2 from Sebastien Bardeau 2011-11-23 09:22:12 UTC --- Well, we are definitely interested in what the standard says exactly. Because if this is explicitly forbidden, we are wondering what the Fortran committee had in mind for programs using thousands of subroutines and where the programmers want to provide the interfaces for each. I just hope the official recommendation is different from defining all the subroutines as module procedures in a single 100000-lines long module...