From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9648 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2011 14:58:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 9631 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Nov 2011 14:58:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:57:54 +0000 From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:21:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg02494.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 --- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-25 14:57:24 UTC --- > --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-25 14:46:07 UTC --- > Thanks for the info - that error implies the mutex was not correctly > initialized. > > What are these macros defined to (if defined)? > > __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT > __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT > __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION With -g3 -save-temps, I find #define __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER and #define PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER {_PTHREAD_MSTATE_CONFIG, _PTHREAD_MVALID | _PTHREAD_MVF_STA} #define _PTHREAD_MSTATE_CONFIG 0x00200000 #define _PTHREAD_MVALID (0x05bcafe1L) #define _PTHREAD_MVF_STA 0x08000000L >> FAIL: 30_threads/future/cons/constexpr.cc scan-assembler-not > _ZNSt6futureIvEC2Ev >> FAIL: 30_threads/future/cons/constexpr.cc scan-assembler-not > _ZNSt6futureIiEC2Ev >> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_future/cons/constexpr.cc scan-assembler-not > _ZNSt13shared_futureIvEC2Ev >> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_future/cons/constexpr.cc scan-assembler-not > _ZNSt13shared_futureIiEC2Ev > > These errors indicate a front-end problem (failing to do static init for the > constexpr constructor) or a bug in the testcase. I think it's a testcase bug: for the first case, grep reveals #.stabs "future:Tt4100=s16!1,020,4071;__base_ctor ::4102=#4100,3,4103=*4100,4104=&4105=k4106=4072,3;:_ZNSt6futureIvEC2ERKSt10shared_ptrINSt13__future_base11_State_baseEE;0A.;__comp_ctor ::4102:_ZNSt6futureIvEC1ERKSt10shared_ptrINSt13__future_base11_State_baseEE;0A.;__base_ctor ::4107=#4100,3,4103,3;:_ZNSt6futureIvEC2Ev;2A.;__comp_ctor ::4107:_ZNSt6futureIvEC1Ev;2A.;__base_ctor ::4108=#4100,3,4103,4109=&4110=4100,3;:_ZNSt6futureIvEC2EOS0_;2A.;__comp_ctor ::4108:_ZNSt6futureIvEC1EOS0_;2A.;__base_ctor ::4111=#4100,3,4103,4112=&4113=k4110,3;:_ZNSt6futureIvEC2ERKS0_;2A.;__comp_ctor ::4111:_ZNSt6futureIvEC1ERKS0_;2A.;operator=::4114=#4100,4115=&4110,4103,4112,3;:_ZNSt6futureIvEaSERKS0_;2A.4116=#4100,4115,4103,4109,3;:_ZNSt6futureIvEaSEOS0_;2A.;get::4117=#4100,3,4103,3;:_ZNSt6futureIvE3getEv;2A.;share::4118=#4100,4095,4103,3;:_ZNSt6futureIvE5shareEv;2A.;;",128,0,727,0 With -g0, grep finds nothing else. Rainer