From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9878 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2012 21:20:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 9837 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Apr 2012 21:20:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:19:46 +0000 From: "marc.glisse at normalesup dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/51314] [C++0x] sizeof... and parentheses Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marc.glisse at normalesup dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg01689.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51314 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2012-04-19 21:19:23 UTC --- Created attachment 27200 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27200 patch s.cc: In function 'void f(U ...)': s.cc:3:18: error: 'sizeof...' argument must be surrounded by parentheses A x; // template argument 1 is invalid ^ s.cc:3:19: error: template argument 1 is invalid A x; // template argument 1 is invalid ^ s.cc:3:22: error: invalid type in declaration before ';' token A x; // template argument 1 is invalid ^ s.cc: At global scope: s.cc:10:37: error: 'sizeof...' argument must be surrounded by parentheses typedef Indices type; // OK ^ Error recovery is not that great in the first case, but fine in the second.