public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "marc.glisse at normalesup dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/51336] [C++11] is_abstract and sfinae
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-51336-4-jRGR5B0vcW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-51336-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51336
Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at normalesup dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at normalesup dot org> 2011-11-29 10:34:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> All right, now the is_abstract behavior is settled, do you think the fixed code
> provided by Daniel in comment #1 should produce a warning, since the
> declaration is absolutely useless (I may be missing something)?
Ah, I did find a case where it was used:
I added a A(A&) constructor to prevent the default A(A const&) from being
generated, and then the template version was used when copying from const (only
if T is int).
Closing the bug as invalid, thanks for your answers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-29 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-28 19:30 [Bug c++/51336] New: " marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
2011-11-28 21:05 ` [Bug c++/51336] " daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2011-11-28 21:49 ` marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
2011-11-29 8:49 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2011-11-29 10:29 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-11-29 10:36 ` marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
2011-11-29 10:51 ` marc.glisse at normalesup dot org [this message]
2011-11-29 11:26 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2011-11-29 12:02 ` marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
2011-11-29 13:00 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2022-02-17 10:41 ` [Bug c++/51336] [C++11] warn on inaccessible template special member functions redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-51336-4-jRGR5B0vcW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).