From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7021 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2011 18:59:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 7004 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Nov 2011 18:59:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:59:36 +0000 From: "marc.glisse at normalesup dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/51336] New: [C++11] is_abstract and sfinae Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:30:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marc.glisse at normalesup dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg02689.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51336 Bug #: 51336 Summary: [C++11] is_abstract and sfinae Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: marc.glisse@normalesup.org #include template struct A { template::value>::type> A(A const&){} }; constexpr bool b = std::is_abstract>::value; $ g++ -std=c++0x n.cc -c n.cc: In instantiation of 'struct A': /tmp/gcc/inst/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/type_traits:530:12: required from 'struct std::is_abstract >' n.cc:7:47: required from here n.cc:5:3: error: no type named 'type' in 'struct std::enable_if' I am not sure what is supposed to happen (that's why I tried), but this result doesn't seem right. Filed under C++ because is_abstract directly forwards to the __is_abstract builtin, but feel free to reassign to libstdc++ if you think the problem is there somehow. I first tried it with is_copy_constructible (which indirectly calls is_abstract through is_destructible) to check the value it would give (clang+libc++ says is_copy_constructible is true).