From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20902 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2011 23:20:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 20889 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Nov 2011 23:20:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:20:32 +0000 From: "bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/51338] [4.6/4.7 Regression] seg fault in gfc_dep_compare_expr with -O2 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:45:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg02725.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51338 --- Comment #6 from Bud Davis 2011-11-28 23:20:27 UTC --- The above patch has no new testsuite regressions. If someone wants to check and make sure the optimisation(s) that could or were being done is still correct, and check this in, feel free to do so. 1 Hour 40 minutes after bug posted. not bad..... --bud