From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29056 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2011 16:49:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 29045 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Nov 2011 16:49:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:49:09 +0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51359] std::string::reserve inefficiency/possible accidental behavior with reserve() Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:13:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg02866.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51359 Paolo Carlini changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-30 16:48:40 UTC --- Maybe something could be fine tuned here, but really, after all these years and the very serious ABI issues with std::string, and, last but not least, the fact that in C++11, the implementation will be completely different anyway (can't be reference counted) nothing is going to happen here, sorry.