From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12894 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2014 12:14:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12843 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jun 2014 12:14:11 -0000 From: "vl.still at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/51373] [C++0x] ICE for static pointer to member initialized in-class Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vl.still at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00469.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D51373 --- Comment #6 from Vladim=C3=ADr =C5=A0till --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > Fixed in 4.9.0 though I'm glad to hear that, I could not yet installed 4.9.0 in my OS. >>From gcc-bugs-return-453388-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Jun 06 12:19:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18012 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2014 12:19:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17946 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jun 2014 12:19:04 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00470.txt.bz2 Content-length: 239 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 --- Comment #33 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yeah, I'd say we could document that gcc doesn't support any implementations where memcpy/memmove/memset clobber errno.