From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21403 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2011 22:22:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 21395 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Dec 2011 22:22:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:22:43 +0000 From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/51415] New: Broken diagnostic: 'vec_init_expr' not supported by dump_expr Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00342.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51415 Bug #: 51415 Summary: Broken diagnostic: 'vec_init_expr' not supported by dump_expr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: reichelt@gcc.gnu.org A broken diagnostic is generated since GCC 4.5.0 for the following invalid code snippet: =============== void foo() { int x[1]; [x]{} = 0; } =============== bug.cc: In function 'void foo()': bug.cc:4:11: error: no match for 'operator=' in '{#'vec_init_expr' not supported by dump_expr#} = 0' bug.cc:4:11: note: candidate is: bug.cc:4:5: note: foo()::& foo()::::operator=(const foo()::&) bug.cc:4:5: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from 'int' to 'const foo()::&'