From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28664 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2011 20:52:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 28638 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Dec 2011 20:52:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:52:34 +0000 From: "ajax at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/51427] New: Less-than-useful error message when union/struct tags conflict Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ajax at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00480.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D51427 Bug #: 51427 Summary: Less-than-useful error message when union/struct tags conflict Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: ajax@redhat.com CC: dodji@gcc.gnu.org [ajax@f17 tmp]$ cat test.c #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" { #endif typedef struct _GMutex GMutex; typedef union _GMutex GMutex; #ifdef __cplusplus }; #endif [ajax@f17 tmp]$ g++ -Wall -c -o test.o test.c test.c:5:19: error: =E2=80=98union=E2=80=99 tag used in naming =E2=80=98str= uct _GMutex=E2=80=99 [-fpermissive] This message is unhelpful. At the very least it should say where the conflicting typedef came from, since it could easily be in a different file= .=20 The text itself is a bit unclear as well, something more like "GMutex alrea= dy defined as 'struct _GMutex' at ..." might be better. Note that the C frontend gets this right already: [ajax@f17 tmp]$ gcc -Wall -c -o test.o test.c test.c:5:19: error: =E2=80=98_GMutex=E2=80=99 defined as wrong kind of tag test.c:5:27: error: conflicting types for =E2=80=98GMutex=E2=80=99 test.c:4:28: note: previous declaration of =E2=80=98GMutex=E2=80=99 was here