public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "josh at joshtriplett dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/51437] GCC should warn on the use of reserved identifier/macro names
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 05:48:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-51437-4-gc2dlTd3hG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-51437-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51437

--- Comment #7 from Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett dot org> 2012-02-19 04:41:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I would greatly like to see this as well; actually I was just about to file a
> duplicate report when I found this, as a result of finding "struct _Color" in
> GIMP source... >_<
> 
> I think the system headers issue could be handled very easily, with no false
> positives and few false negatives. The heuristic would basically be to flag any
> occurrence of reserved names except in header files found in the -isystem path,
> or in text resulting from expansion of a macro defined by a header file in the
> -isystem path.

You don't want to flag all occurrences of reserved names, just definitions
using reserved names.  Flagging uses will just result in duplicate warnings for
the same symbols.  Also, the code that uses a symbol doesn't really have a
choice; it has to use the symbol as defined.  Better to generate a warning on
the definition only.

Good call on the issue of "text resulting from expansion of a macro"; that
seems like precisely one of the cases where system headers will want to use
_Reserved names to avoid conflict with user-defined identifiers.

I'd suggest using precisely the heuristic GCC currently uses to avoid
generating warnings in system headers, as specified in
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/System-Headers.html , including the bit
saying "Macros defined in a system header are immune to a few warnings wherever
they are expanded."

Arguably this also needs special handling to avoid making -Wsystem-headers any
more useless, similar to the handling of -Wunknown-pragmas, but that doesn't
seem like a necessary prerequisite for adding this feature.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-19  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-06 11:20 [Bug c/51437] New: " vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com
2011-12-06 11:37 ` [Bug c/51437] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-06 11:50 ` vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com
2011-12-06 13:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-16 11:55 ` potswa at mac dot com
2012-02-19  4:42 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2012-02-19  5:48 ` josh at joshtriplett dot org [this message]
2012-02-19  6:30 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2012-02-19  8:01 ` josh at joshtriplett dot org
2012-02-19  9:34 ` vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com
2012-02-19 11:17 ` potswa at mac dot com
2012-02-19 18:57 ` josh at joshtriplett dot org
2012-02-19 18:58 ` josh at joshtriplett dot org
2012-02-19 22:42 ` vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com
2021-11-18 21:21 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-24 18:08 ` pavel.morozkin at gmail dot com
2022-09-23 14:24 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-23 20:20 ` pavel.morozkin at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-51437-4-gc2dlTd3hG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).