From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17643 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2012 20:19:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 17605 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jan 2012 20:19:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:18:50 +0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/51450] configure's test for -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions broken Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:54:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg03573.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51450 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-30 20:18:31 UTC --- Looks like there are two different places in configure which test -fno-rtti and -fno-exceptions: One around line 28658 (which does not use lt_simple_compile_test_code And one around line 14958 (which does use it). I was looking at the first one rather than the second one.