From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19456 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2012 22:25:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 19447 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jan 2012 22:25:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:25:12 +0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/51471] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040811-1.c and gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c fails at -O3 -g on mips64-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00449.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471 --- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-04 22:24:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > I still wonder though why Richard Henderson says in PR50283 comment 9: We're > supposed to prevent frame-related insns from appearing in branch delay slots. I think the main reason is it is hard to describe it in cfi's in a branch delay slot.