From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D7B283858C60; Wed,  7 Feb 2024 00:57:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D7B283858C60
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707267440;
	bh=FdSAVHpQksjpHCzMGPJOUm6TJ0vYfQPjt75qPTWcCvE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=o160zjSOnBAcQd9Z5PlJBqJu4tMbsxY6KNkw/crui2wxHIWrdy5UTp4uUvZ0qihMm
	 bivJWirLD8oayTi3rAmKWtZ39Z2yX9Qn056bW1e0JWemW8xO7b05rfLgtb+L9Aa2pr
	 /l3g0CG7eNnC1zr6TZ65DmQq5KrPtcZvx9PkVCIw=
From: "pan2.li at intel dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51492] vectorizer does not support saturated
 arithmetic patterns
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:57:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pan2.li at intel dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-51492-4-AiVUdCRJ0c@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D51492

--- Comment #18 from Li Pan <pan2.li at intel dot com> ---
Thanks for the confirmation.

Yes, it was before expand. I will prepare one PATCH for this, and it should
target for gcc-15 I bet.=