public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pan2.li at intel dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51492] vectorizer does not support saturated arithmetic patterns
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 01:13:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-51492-4-VMBJ0ARteK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-51492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51492

--- Comment #16 from Li Pan <pan2.li at intel dot com> ---
I have a try like below and finally have the Standard Name "SAT_ADD". Could you
please help to double-check if my understanding is correct?

Given below example code below:

typedef unsigned int uint32_t;

uint32_t
sat_add (uint32_t x, uint32_t y)
{
  return (x + y) | - ((x + y) < x);
}

And then add one simpify to match.pd and define new DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN for
it. Then we have the SAT_ADD representation after expand.

uint32_t sat_add (uint32_t x, uint32_t y)
{
  uint32_t _6;

;;   basic block 2, loop depth 0
;;    pred:       ENTRY
  _6 = .SAT_ADD (x_4(D), y_5(D)); [tail call]
  return _6;
;;    succ:       EXIT

}

If everything goes well, I will prepare the patch for it later. Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-06  1:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-10  1:38 [Bug tree-optimization/51492] New: vectorizer generates unnecessary code drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
2011-12-12 10:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51492] vectorizer does not support saturated arithmetic patterns rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-08 18:57 ` drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
2012-07-13  8:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-24 23:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-25  3:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-01 13:06 ` pan2.li at intel dot com
2024-02-01 13:37 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
2024-02-01 13:42 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
2024-02-01 14:40 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
2024-02-01 14:41 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
2024-02-01 15:10 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-02  1:04 ` pan2.li at intel dot com
2024-02-02 11:11 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-03  6:57 ` pan2.li at intel dot com
2024-02-06  1:13 ` pan2.li at intel dot com [this message]
2024-02-06 22:11 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-07  0:57 ` pan2.li at intel dot com
2024-05-16 12:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-16 12:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-18  2:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-51492-4-VMBJ0ARteK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).