From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4E8C43858403; Sat,  3 Feb 2024 06:57:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4E8C43858403
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1706943438;
	bh=+nnPi6MlMcngdq2RnyCUXLduM9m2MAeTmiSKdpfJHmc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=eFf7H05KfDqj40HG/cAEY/IPbcI1B8H+x8jF4XCT3fkjm+40h1pcoRhi8MLf0efxT
	 yMZRutt8lGuYFAEfYKEstD2CdznPeMq1RqJWa447q55Cab4MMa0rNjCq/RQdXJ14xV
	 XbVohytXEww5Bjglj3OopddHPyLqU2nE10hfkHLM=
From: "pan2.li at intel dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51492] vectorizer does not support saturated
 arithmetic patterns
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 06:57:16 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pan2.li at intel dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-51492-4-dRPIBXl7Yi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D51492

--- Comment #15 from Li Pan <pan2.li at intel dot com> ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #14)
> Awesome! Feel free to reach out if you need any help.
>=20
> It=E2=80=99s likely easier to start with add and sub and get things pipe =
cleaned and
> expand incrementally than to try and do it all at once.

Cool, thanks in advance.

I will first try to make a SAT_ADD to the direct optab for a POC following =
your
RFC and suggestion. Looks like at least match.pd and internal-fn.def will be
touched. I am learning how match.pd works right now.=