From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-380316-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11994 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2012 10:59:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 11978 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jan 2012 10:59:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:59:12 +0000
From: "bonzini at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/51505] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in form_sum, at reload.c:5349 with -O --param max-cse-insns=1
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, ra
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bonzini at gnu dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.5.4
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51505-4-ysuJZdLHbW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51505-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51505-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg01991.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505

--- Comment #10 from Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org> 2012-01-18 10:58:19 UTC ---
Not using df_notes_rescan looks like premature optimization to me...