From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5F0E0385E027; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 18:31:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5F0E0385E027 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587148302; bh=yQ3jR6Qq74/NjfdbzDhmUO226fzLST4qJDM9xZUssCg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GAWjfBX3lL0J/P7qo3Wvo1T+C6gYlwp+nd+ZTVG9EJHvDNfQ71MbCQOetbpM4bERw rX7byeaDYU79JOlB/ETvivmdTXBTWjp24T+pjxQQcqWoC4s7mKcH8fZsHHEpnU0fJH is5DIjrYvNve+eDSjTnEjIsPl6ruy52DABGn/+3E= From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51513] Only partially optimizes away __builtin_unreachable switch default case Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 18:31:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution cf_reconfirmed_on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 18:31:42 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D51513 Peter Bergner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- Last reconfirmed|2015-04-28 00:00:00 |2020-4-17 --- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner --- Confirmed, I see the same issue with the test case in Comment #12 on powerpc64le-linux using gcc-8. I also see the original problem with the original test case using gcc-8 as well.=