From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-379684-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2078 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2012 10:08:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 2067 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2012 10:08:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:07:52 +0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/51520] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.3
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Keywords
Message-ID: <bug-51520-4-JuClzxc6HY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg01359.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code

--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-12 10:07:47 UTC ---
Further reduced test case. Seems to be related to c_ptr/c_null_ptr. Maybe some
parts of Rev. 181425 iso_c_binding related changes in symbol.c are sufficient?

module sidl_array_array_F03
  use iso_c_binding
  type sidl__array
    type(c_ptr) :: a = c_null_ptr
  end type sidl__array
end module sidl_array_array_F03

module vect_Utils_F03
  use sidl_array_array_F03
contains
  subroutine is_null_s(ext)
    class(sidl__array), intent(in) :: ext
  end subroutine is_null_s
end module vect_Utils_F03

subroutine evalResA(res)
  use vect_Utils_F03
  type (sidl__array) :: res
  call is_null_s(res)
end subroutine evalResA