From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29884 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2011 11:05:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 29872 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2011 11:05:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:05:05 +0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:18:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Keywords Last reconfirmed AssignedTo Resolution Ever Confirmed Summary Severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg01491.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |documentation Last reconfirmed| |2011-12-14 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |redi at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Resolution|INVALID | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Summary|partial_sum (int *, int *, |doxygen documentation for |int *, multiplies < int >) |partial_sum misleading |does not use operator | |+(complex, complex) | Severity|normal |minor --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-14 11:05:04 UTC --- I'll fix those docs, the overload taking a predicate doesn't even use operator+ anyway.