From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-376873-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23857 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2011 23:41:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 23841 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Dec 2011 23:41:42 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:41:30 +0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51540] partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex)
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51540-4-bwMz0Iuvkg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg01439.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-13 23:41:26 UTC ---
what has complex got to do with it?