public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51540] partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex)
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-51540-4-cOUNdsJZRL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-51540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540

Christopher Yeleighton <giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |

--- Comment #3 from Christopher Yeleighton <giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl> 2011-12-14 06:22:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> what has complex got to do with it?

The documentation says this algorithm uses operator+; when you follow, it turns
out that it means operator + (complex, complex).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-14  6:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-13 23:07 [Bug libstdc++/51540] New: " giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
2011-12-14  0:06 ` [Bug libstdc++/51540] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-14  0:30 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-14  7:16 ` giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl [this message]
2011-12-14  9:39 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-12-14 10:26 ` giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
2011-12-14 10:59 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-12-14 11:05 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-14 11:18 ` [Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-14 11:19 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-12-15  9:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-15  9:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-16 19:14 ` giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
2011-12-16 20:17 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-12-16 20:33 ` giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
2011-12-17 13:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-17 13:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-17 17:55 ` giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
2011-12-18 22:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-18 23:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-51540-4-cOUNdsJZRL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).