From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-376918-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15092 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2011 10:20:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 15077 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2011 10:20:44 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:20:32 +0000
From: "giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51540] partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex)
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution
Message-ID: <bug-51540-4-uEQThvNfiE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg01484.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540

Christopher Yeleighton <giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |

--- Comment #5 from Christopher Yeleighton <giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl> 2011-12-14 10:20:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> When you follow?!? Simply there are no complex numbers in your code. Full stop.

When you follow the hyperlink, you land at the description of operator +
(complex, complex).  When you hover, you are being told "returns new value
complex x + y" (not in Lynx though).

My code does not contain complex numbers but the algorithm is documented to use
an operator that uses complex numbers.