From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19370 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2011 23:06:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 19362 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Dec 2011 23:06:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:06:37 +0000 From: "giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51540] New: partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg01431.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 Bug #: 51540 Summary: partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >) does not use operator +(complex, complex) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/latest-doxygen /a01567.html#a17bad49fa9fb1c5c41d019b16970fe9e Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl Host: i586-suse-linux Target: i586-suse-linux Build: i586-suse-linux The following code fails to run: int main () { int x [02] = { 0, 01 }; ::std ::partial_sum (x, x + 02, x, ::std ::multiplies < int > ()); assert (+x [01] == 01); return +EXIT_SUCCESS; } Actual result: int main(): Assertion `+x [01] == 01' failed. Expected result: I do not know, as the documentation does not say which complex class should be used. Maybe it should not compile at all.