From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20356 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2011 16:08:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 20341 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2011 16:08:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:08:33 +0000 From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51600] [4.7 Regression] ice in estimate_local_effects Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:34:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg02137.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600 Martin Jambor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2011-12-19 16:08:28 UTC --- Well, this means that estimate_ipcp_clone_size_and_time returns a negative size growth estimate. The function is basically inlining heuristics with special interface so perhaps such mishaps are to be expected and I should take care even of negative values (PR 51362 was about this function returning zero size growth estimates). Or are they not, Honza?