From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-377566-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13440 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2011 15:52:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 13429 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2011 15:52:34 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_NL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:52:21 +0000
From: "danlnagle at me dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: danlnagle at me dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51605-4-HSCmOMCBCQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51605-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51605-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg02132.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605

--- Comment #11 from Dan Nagle <danlnagle at me dot com> 2011-12-19 15:51:40 UTC ---
Hi,

I can confirm that changing the label of the select type to

integer_or_logical_or_error

removes the ICE.

I did so at lines 9325 and 13536 in the original source.

The new label is a better description of the purpose of the select type anyway.

Thanks, everyone!  The new version of coco has some (I think anyway)
good new features, and some older stuff removed, as per requests.
So it's very good to have gfortran on the list of compilers known to work.

The new coco is in testing now, but I hope to be able to distribute it RSN.

On Dec 19, 2011, at 08:17 , burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605
> 
> --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-19 13:17:15 UTC ---
> Dan: Your program should work (with 4.6.2 - or with 4.7 + my patch) if you
> either change either the SELECT TYPE label or the subroutine name from
> "integer_or_logical" to something else.
> 
> * * *
> 
> Reduced test case for the ICE:
> 
> contains
>  subroutine foo
>    BLOCK_NAME: block
>    end block BLOCK_NAME
>  end subroutine foo
> 
>  subroutine BLOCK_NAME()
>  end subroutine BLOCK_NAME
> 
>  subroutine bar()
>  end subroutine bar
> end
> 
> -- 
> Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug.