From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-377430-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1393 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2011 13:14:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 1379 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Dec 2011 13:14:47 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_NL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:14:34 +0000
From: "danlnagle at me dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: danlnagle at me dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51605-4-jL9CUfpClw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51605-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51605-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg01996.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605

--- Comment #5 from Dan Nagle <danlnagle at me dot com> 2011-12-18 13:13:48 UTC ---
Citations from 10-007r1.pdf

[185:17-18] says the polymorphic symbol_ptr takes the type of the type guard
within the type guard.

[171:7-8] says the associating entity loses the pointer attribute but keeps the
target attribute.
(It has the target attribute because it was a pointer outside the type guard.)

Therefore I believe it's conforming to point to the associating entity with a
typed pointer.
(integer_ptr => symbol_ptr)

My analysis could be faulty.

I'm using the gfortran I'm using because it had a Mac installer.  I thought
4.6.2 was fairly recent.

This is all new stuff and I'm learning it myself and getting surprised here and
there.

Thanks for your efforts.