From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-377426-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8025 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2011 12:02:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 8009 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Dec 2011 12:02:46 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:02:33 +0000
From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51609] New: [C++11] unique_ptr<const T[]>::reset rejects cv-compatible argument pointers
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51609-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg01992.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D51609

             Bug #: 51609
           Summary: [C++11] unique_ptr<const T[]>::reset rejects
                    cv-compatible argument pointers
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com


gcc 4.7.0 20111210 (experimental) in C++0x mode rejects the following code:=
=20

//---------------
#include <memory>

struct T {};

T* bar() { return new T{}; }

int main()
{
  std::unique_ptr<const T[]> p;
  p.reset(bar()); // # Line 10
}
//---------------

"main.cpp||In function 'int main()':|
main.cpp|10|error: use of deleted function 'void std::unique_ptr<_Tp [],
_Dp>::reset(_Up) [with _Up =3D T*; _Tp =3D const T; _Dp =3D std::default_de=
lete<const
T []>]'|
[..]include\c++\4.7.0\bits\unique_ptr.h|392|error: declared here|
"

This behaviour is in conflict with the standard. Referring to N3290
[unique.ptr.runtime] p1 b2:

"=E2=80=94 Pointers to types derived from T are rejected by the constructor=
s, and by
reset."

Further inspection of [unique.ptr.runtime.modifiers] does not reveal any
further constraints that could invalidate the assumption that reset should
accept the pointer to non-const T. This should also not be invalidated by t=
he
constraints on default_delete<T[]>::operator(), because the deleter will al=
ways
be called on the internally hold pointer which has the correct type.

In regard to the seemingly difference to the constructor constraints of
[unique.ptr.runtime.ctor] p1 I would like to point to a new LWG issue:

http://cplusplus.github.com/LWG/lwg-active.html#2118