From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-437858-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7280 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2013 16:19:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7203 invoked by uid 48); 17 Dec 2013 16:19:25 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/51610] [OOP] Class container does not properly handle POINTER and TARGET
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-51610-4-NUnYxS3U6i@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51610-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51610-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg01513.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51610

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEW

--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> AFAICS, we still get the bogus error:
>
>       target :: a, b, c
>                     1
> Error: Duplicate TARGET attribute specified at (1)

Reduced test:

       type t
       end type t
       class(t), allocatable :: a(:), b(:), c(:)
! Bogus error: Error: Duplicate TARGET attribute specified
       target :: a, b, c
     end

There is no error if CLASS is replaced with TYPE or REAL. I still think it
would be better to have a new PR opened for it.

BTW I think the test in comment 1 is invalid due to

...
       allocate (a(1), b(1), c(1))
...
        class(t), target :: y(3)
        class(t) :: x(3)
...