public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "sven.koehler at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/51628] __attribute__((packed)) is unsafe in some cases
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-51628-4-t4ZBqPFKv3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-51628-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628

--- Comment #24 from Sven <sven.koehler at gmail dot com> ---
Comment #4 mentions typedef int myint __attribute__((aligned(1)));
That shouldn't even work. The GCC documentation on Type Attributes mentions
that "The aligned attribute can only increase the alignment". It goes on to
mention the packed attribute, which can be used to decrease alignment. But as
far as I know, that attributes was designed for structs. Anyhow, it seems that
the aligned attribute is intended for increasing the alignment only - not for
decreasing.

Yet, when I checked __alignof(myint) with both gcc and clang, it was in fact
decreased from 4 to 1. Not sure why. That seems to contradict the
documentation.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-10 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-19 23:00 [Bug c/51628] New: " Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com
2011-12-19 23:17 ` [Bug c/51628] " Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com
2011-12-19 23:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-20  0:43 ` Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com
2011-12-20 10:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-20 10:54 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-20 11:19 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-20 11:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-20 11:34 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-20 11:57 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-20 12:00 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-20 12:29 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-20 13:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-20 13:29 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-20 17:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-02  0:58 ` peter at axium dot co.nz
2013-04-02  8:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-02  8:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-02 20:21 ` peter at axium dot co.nz
2013-04-03  7:30 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-03  7:55 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2013-04-03  8:51 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-03  9:20 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-10 13:29 ` sven.koehler at gmail dot com
2015-03-10 13:40 ` sven.koehler at gmail dot com [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-51628-4-t4ZBqPFKv3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).