public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "exponent-bias at yandex dot ru" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/51656] New: C front end and strtold handle hexadecimal floating differently
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-51656-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51656

             Bug #: 51656
           Summary: C front end and strtold handle hexadecimal floating
                    differently
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: exponent-bias@yandex.ru


Consider this program:

----
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>

long double f;

int main(void)
{
    f = 0x9.1a1c9420419a1a08p0L;
    printf("%.15La\n", f);

    f = strtold("0x9.1a1c9420419a1a08p0", NULL);
    printf("%.15La\n", f);

    return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
----

That program prints:
0x9.1a1c9420419a1a0p+0
0x9.1a1c9420419a1a1p+0

Note the difference in the last mantissas' digits. I believe that difference
can be considered a bug by at least two reasons: 1) the "strtold()" function
seems to be rounding hexadecimals by rules that don't match neither of the
standard rounding mode (including the to-nearest mode for which it should
return 0x9.1a1c9420419a1a0p+0) and 2) that difference breaks user's
expectations in that these two ways of acquiring floating-point values should
behave identically under the same rounding mode.

Command-line options used:
gcc --float-store -g -O0 -o test test.c

Compiler version:
gcc-4.4.real (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3

Host and target platforms:
32-bit x86 system


             reply	other threads:[~2011-12-22 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-22 20:45 exponent-bias at yandex dot ru [this message]
2011-12-23  9:16 ` [Bug c/51656] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-51656-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).