public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/51663] Desirable/undesirable elimination of unused variables & functions at -O0, -O0 -flto and -O0 -fwhole-program Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:07:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-51663-4-foTw8vCUL5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-51663-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51663 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-26 07:05:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > The inconsistency should be solved. The question however is what kind of > behaviour we want at -O0 from LTO. > > It seems to me that at -O0 the LTO/non-LTO output should be as close as > possible and thus LTO should not privatize symbols and break more silly > debuggers/tools (this is especially important for SLIM mode). > > We still do renaming of statics and other nasty things, but we should not do > more than neccesary. > > On the the other hand, I think -fwhole-program should still do privatization. > This patch implements it. In addition to this it drops more unobvious > transformation from -fwhole-program where we bring local COMDAT virtual tables > and functions w/o address taken since we know duplicating them does not hurt. > > Does this look sane? Yes. I think for -O0 -flto we should default to 1:1 partitioning and _not_ do the renaming of local symbols though ... of course -O0 -flto does not make too much sense? > Honza > > Index: ipa.c > =================================================================== > --- ipa.c (revision 185777) > +++ ipa.c (working copy) > @@ -616,7 +616,8 @@ cgraph_externally_visible_p (struct cgra > if (TARGET_DLLIMPORT_DECL_ATTRIBUTES > && lookup_attribute ("dllexport", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (node->decl))) > return true; > - if (node->resolution == LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY) > + if (node->resolution == LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY > + && optimize) > return false; > /* When doing LTO or whole program, we can bring COMDAT functoins static. > This improves code quality and we know we will duplicate them at most > twice > @@ -624,11 +625,13 @@ cgraph_externally_visible_p (struct cgra > implementing same COMDAT) */ > if ((in_lto_p || whole_program) > && DECL_COMDAT (node->decl) > + && optimize > && cgraph_comdat_can_be_unshared_p (node)) > return false; > > /* When doing link time optimizations, hidden symbols become local. */ > if (in_lto_p > + && optimize > && (DECL_VISIBILITY (node->decl) == VISIBILITY_HIDDEN > || DECL_VISIBILITY (node->decl) == VISIBILITY_INTERNAL) > /* Be sure that node is defined in IR file, not in other object > @@ -681,7 +684,8 @@ varpool_externally_visible_p (struct var > This is needed for i.e. references from asm statements. */ > if (varpool_used_from_object_file_p (vnode)) > return true; > - if (vnode->resolution == LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY) > + if (vnode->resolution == LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY > + && optimize) > return false; > > /* As a special case, the COMDAT virutal tables can be unshared. > @@ -690,6 +694,7 @@ varpool_externally_visible_p (struct var > is faster for dynamic linking. Also this match logic hidding vtables > from LTO symbol tables. */ > if ((in_lto_p || flag_whole_program) > + && optimize > && !vnode->force_output > && DECL_COMDAT (vnode->decl) && DECL_VIRTUAL_P (vnode->decl)) > return false;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-26 7:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-12-23 11:24 [Bug lto/51663] New: LTO does not reclaim comdat-local statics rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-04 12:50 ` [Bug lto/51663] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-04 12:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-29 15:58 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-20 16:52 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-24 21:08 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-24 21:13 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-24 22:08 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-25 13:40 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-25 13:52 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-26 7:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2012-03-26 10:49 ` [Bug middle-end/51663] Desirable/undesirable elimination of unused variables & functions at -O0, -O0 -flto and -O0 -fwhole-program hubicka at ucw dot cz 2020-03-17 9:42 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-03-17 10:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-03-17 10:50 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-03-17 12:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-03-17 12:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-51663-4-foTw8vCUL5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).