From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31479 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2012 15:30:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 31464 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jan 2012 15:30:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:29:54 +0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/51669] [4.7 Regression] ICE verify-gimple with openmp Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:30:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51669 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-02 15:29:20 UTC --- Caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181332 aka PR51060. Slightly more reduced testcase: template const T & min (const T &, const T &); void foo () { #pragma omp parallel num_threads (min (4, 5)) ; } which ICEs starting with r181332 with just -fopenmp. struct A { A (); ~A (); }; int foo (const A &); void foo () { #pragma omp parallel num_threads (foo (A ())) ; } apparently ICEd already in 4.2 though. Guess the C++ FE needs to insert some CLEANUP_POINT_EXPRs around the omp stmts.