From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-378154-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30595 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2011 20:38:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 30587 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Dec 2011 20:38:51 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:38:37 +0000
From: "patrick.marlier at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/51696] New: [trans-mem] unsafe indirect function call in struct not properly displayed
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51696-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg02720.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D51696

             Bug #: 51696
           Summary: [trans-mem] unsafe indirect function call in struct
                    not properly displayed
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: patrick.marlier@gmail.com
                CC: aldyh@gcc.gnu.org, torvald@gcc.gnu.org


Created attachment 26196
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D26196
Attached testcase

With an unsafe indirect function call, the error message is not clear. I do=
n't
know if it can display the declaration. In the worst case, "unsafe indirect
function call within =E2=80=98transaction_safe=E2=80=99 function" should be=
 ok.

$ ./gcc/xgcc -B./gcc/ -fgnu-tm -O0 testcase.i
testcase.i: In function =E2=80=98func=E2=80=99:
testcase.i:7:21: error: unsafe function call =E2=80=98<Uf3c0>=E2=80=99 with=
in
=E2=80=98transaction_safe=E2=80=99 function
testcase.i:8:12: error: unsafe function call =E2=80=98compare.1=E2=80=99 wi=
thin
=E2=80=98transaction_safe=E2=80=99 function

Patrick Marlier.