From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8281 invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2011 23:31:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 8272 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Dec 2011 23:31:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:30:51 +0000 From: "ed at 80386 dot nl" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/51705] FreeBSD uses unsupported C++11 features when __cplusplus == 201103L Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ed at 80386 dot nl X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg02785.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 --- Comment #14 from Ed Schouten 2011-12-29 23:30:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Feel free to keep > arguing otherwise, but wherever the problem lies, it's not that libstdc++ uses > C++11 features Steve and I merely have our doubts about the current value of __cplusplus during the compilation of libstdc++ -- not whether C++11 features are used inside libstdc++. But this discussion starts to turn into an infinite loop. Doesn't Bugzilla allow a bug reporter to unsubscribe? I trust you folks will get it sorted out eventually.