From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3520 invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2011 19:34:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 3371 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Dec 2011 19:34:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:34:32 +0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51705] Build infrastructure should not use -std=c++0x until g++ properly supports it Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:42:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg02766.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-29 19:34:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Essentially GCC is free to announce __cplusplus == 201103L for its experimental > C++11 support, but the C++11 support should not be used during its own > compilation step if it's not finished yet. How should files needed for that C++11 support be compiled then? It needs to be used to compile e.g. src/thread.cc which defines the functions declared in the C++11 header Until attributes are supported I think this should be dealt with by removing [[noreturn]] using fixincludes.