public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tobi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:30:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-51727-4-pFS5BkohHC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-51727-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #22 from Tobias Schlüter <tobi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-13 11:29:41 UTC --- Created attachment 28440 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28440 patch that doesn't use c++ Here's a patch that works essentially the same way, but doesn't use C++. It's about 50 lines longer than the other patch and produces identical module files in the small examples. It's not yet ready for submission, as I haven't yet added all the necessary comments, also maybe some variables could be named better, but I would do this if you think it's worthy fixing this on the old branches as well. I would then submit the C++ patch for the trunk and the C version for the older branches.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-13 11:30 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-01-02 0:20 [Bug fortran/51727] New: " mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-05 18:16 ` [Bug fortran/51727] " Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-05 19:35 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 11:41 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 12:42 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-06 12:46 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-06 12:47 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-06 12:48 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-06 12:52 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-08 9:33 ` simonb at google dot com 2012-10-10 9:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-10 9:48 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-11 12:37 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-11 13:03 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-11 13:30 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-11 14:02 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 8:08 ` simonb at google dot com 2012-10-13 8:09 ` aaw at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 8:13 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-13 8:31 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 9:26 ` simonb at google dot com 2012-10-13 9:32 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-13 11:30 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2012-10-13 12:28 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-13 12:45 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-15 14:14 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-28 11:11 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-10-28 11:15 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 15:46 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 22:22 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-09 7:31 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-11-09 9:44 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-09 10:05 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-11-29 7:31 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-51727-4-pFS5BkohHC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).