public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/51736] New: generic fortran procedures with allocatable/pointer argument
@ 2012-01-02 19:06 wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org
2012-01-02 22:39 ` [Bug fortran/51736] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org @ 2012-01-02 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51736
Bug #: 51736
Summary: generic fortran procedures with allocatable/pointer
argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: wangmianzhi1@linuxmail.org
Created attachment 26221
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26221
a reduced example
According to the f2008 standard (12.4.3.4.5), dummy arguments having
allocatable attribute and pointer attribute should be distinguishable. Thus the
attached reduced code should be valid.
Will this feature be included in the later releases? Or could anyone provide
suggestions to work around? Thank you very much for your help and the great
compiler.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/51736] generic fortran procedures with allocatable/pointer argument
2012-01-02 19:06 [Bug fortran/51736] New: generic fortran procedures with allocatable/pointer argument wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org
@ 2012-01-02 22:39 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-02 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51736
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-02 22:38:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Will this feature be included in the later releases?
Yes, it is definitely planed to support this feature, but it has not been
implemented so far and won't be in GCC 4.7.0 (to be released in March?) It
might get implemented for 4.8.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 45521 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-02 22:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-02 19:06 [Bug fortran/51736] New: generic fortran procedures with allocatable/pointer argument wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org
2012-01-02 22:39 ` [Bug fortran/51736] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).