From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19847 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2012 14:28:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 19837 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2012 14:28:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:28:24 +0000 From: "szo at szo dot hu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/51740] New: warning "is used uninitialized in this function" is missing if the variable initialized later Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:28:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: szo at szo dot hu X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D51740 Bug #: 51740 Summary: warning "is used uninitialized in this function" is missing if the variable initialized later Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: szo@szo.hu Created attachment 26231 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D26231 Code that should warn gcc fails to emit the "is used uninitialized in this function" warning, if = the offending variable is initialized via a function later on. See attachment. If compiled with=20 gcc -Wall bug.c gcc issues no warning. If line 13 is commented out, the correct bug.c:11:9: warning: =E2=80=98offender=E2=80=99 is used uninitialized in th= is function [-Wuninitialized] is emitted. I think it's not the same as #18501, because replacing line 13 with offencer =3D 0; still produces the warning correctly.