From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-378814-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2376 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2012 09:39:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 2360 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jan 2012 09:39:51 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:39:30 +0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/51757] friend defined inside class and declared inside main linker error
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution
Message-ID: <bug-51757-4-yObKMOe3b1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51757-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51757-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00489.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51757

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-05 09:39:28 UTC ---
Hm?  How should it _not_ fail to link?  You declare void func() inside
main which puts it in ::, but there is no definition.  Obviously
A::func() is not found by lookup - why should it?